M/S. HOUSING DEVELOP,MENT FINANCE CORPN. LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ADDL CIT RG-1(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that provision for exchange loss on foreign currency loans is allowable on accrual basis as per mercantile system of accounting and AS-11. However, it ruled that income from housing finance for periods less than 5 years, non-residential purposes, and temporary deployment of funds are not eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii).
What were the facts?
The assessee, HDFC Bank Ltd., appealed against the disallowance of provision for exchange loss on foreign currency loans and the computation of deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) had made additions and disallowances related to these claims.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the allowability of provision for exchange loss on foreign currency loans and the eligibility of various income streams for deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(viii),Section 45,Section 10(33),Section 10(23G)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Liberty India v. CIT571 citing317 ITR 218 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Meghalaya Steels Ltd.203 citing383 ITR 217 · 2016 · SC · Read judgment
- Continental Construction Ltd. v. CIT50 citing195 ITR 81 · 1992 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Eltel SGDS P. Ltd.46 citing300 ITR 6 · 2008 · HC
- CIT v. Jagdishprasad M. Joshi38 citing318 ITR 420 · 2009 · HC
- Ltd. v. CIT37 citing79 ITR 589 · 1971 · SC
- 400 ITR 279 (SC) (iv) Shree Balaji Alloys v. CIT28 citing287 CTR 459 · 2016 · SC
- CIT v. Jayanand Khira & Co. (P.) Ltd.6 citing170 ITR 31
- DHFL Venture Capital Fund v. ITO4 citing157 ITD 60 · 2016 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ITA Nos.7532/MUM/2004 & others HDFC Bank Ltd. AYs 1999-2000, 2000-01 & 2001-02 PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
All these six appeals by the assessee and Revenue are
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(viii)
- Sundaram Home Finance Ltd., Chennai vs ITO, Corporate Ward-6(1), ChennaiITA 1996/CHNY/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Sundaram Home Finance Limited, Chennai vs CIT, ChennaiITA 1778/CHNY/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Sundaram Home Finance Limited, Chennai vs CIT, ChennaiITA 1777/CHNY/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Bandhan Bank Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT-6(1), KolkataITA 965/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Small Industries Development Bank of India…ITA 870/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026