M/S. GAZNA SAMABAY KRISHI UNNAYAN SAMITY LIMITED,NADIA vs. ITO, WARD - 41(4), NADIA, NADIA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficient cause for not appearing before the CIT(A). Therefore, the appeal was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on the grounds of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte. The assessee claimed to have been prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) was justified and if the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]
Date of concluding the hearing : February 7th, 2018 Date of pronouncing the order : March 16th, 2018 O R D E R Per J. Sudhakar Reddy :-
This appeal filed by the assesse is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Kolkata, (hereinafter the ‘ld. CIT (A)’), passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 28/06/2017. 2. In this case, I find that the ld. First Appellate Authority, has passed an ex-parte order. The assessee has demonstrated before me that it was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the ld. CIT(A) on the date of hearing.
Hence, I restore this appeal to the file of the ld. First Appellate Authority for fresh adjudication on the grounds of natural justice. The assessee is directed to appear before the ld. First Appellate Authority, within one month of the receipt of this order, take notice and thereafter co-operate in the disposal of the appeal.
Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Ganza Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 16th day of March, 2018. Sd/- [J. Sudhakar Reddy] Accountant Member Dated : 16.03.2018 {SC SPS} Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. M/s. Ganza Samabay Krishi Unnayan Samity Ltd C/o. Partha Sarathi Gupta 100, Bank Lane P.O. Krishnanagar Dist.-Nadia Pin- 741101 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-41(4), Nadia Ananta Hari Mitra Road P.O. Krishnagar Nadia Pin - 741101 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026