M/S. DAY NIGHT SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR. CIT, KOL.-1, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The learned Departmental Representative did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, the assessee's authorized representative requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw their appeal before the tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), 1, Kolkata dt. 09-01-2017 for the A.Y 2012-13.
At the time of hearing before us Shri Abishek Bansal, ACA, the ld. AR of the assessee, submits that the assessee intends to withdraw the appeal by an application dt. 19-03-2018 (copy of the same is on record) as under:-
“ Sub: 2012-13- request for withdrawal of appeal We filed the aforesaid appeal on 20th Feb, 2017 against the order u/s. 263 of the Act passed by the Principal CIT, Kolkata-1, Kolkata, for which the aforesaid appeal number was given. We withdraw the aforesaid appeal filed by us which may be allowed. For this act of kindness we as in duty bound shall ever pray. Yours faithfully, For Day Night Securities Private Limited Sd/- Director”
In view of above, he urged to permit the assessee to withdraw the same. On the other hand, the ld.DR has not objected to such request of the ld.AR. In view of above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 20-03-2018 Sd/- Sd/- Waseem Ahmed S.S. Viswanethra Ravi Accountant Member Judicial Member
Dated : 20-03-2018
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026