M/S M.P. RECYCLING CO PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of charging/computation of interest under Section 234A requires fresh examination by the AO. The AO is directed to re-compute the interest, considering the self-assessment tax paid before the due date, in accordance with CBDT Circular No. 2/2015.
What were the facts?
The assessee's return was filed after the initial due date following a search operation. The AO levied interest under Section 234A for the belated filing. The assessee argued that self-assessment tax was paid before the due date, which should reduce the interest.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 234A is chargeable on self-assessment tax paid before the due date of filing the return of income, and if so, how it should be computed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Pranoy Roy42 citing309 ITR 231 · 2009 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Ravish Sood(JM)
O R D E R Per B.R. Baskaran (AM) :-
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 17-12- 2015 passed by Ld CIT(A)-47, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in confirming the charging of interest u/s 234A of the Act.
We heard the parties and perused the record. The assessee belongs to Arya group, which was subjected to search u/s 132 of the Act on 29.4.2011. Consequent thereto, the present assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Act. In the assessment order, the AO levied interest u/s 234A of the Act for belated filing of return to the tune of Rs.2,60,223/-. The assessee was originally asked to file return of income by notice dated 02-05-2012 (received on 04-05-2012) within 30 days of receipt of notice. The assessee sought time to file return up to 18-06-2012 and again sought time up to 25.06.2012. The AO did not respond to the same and in the assessment order, the assessing officer charged interest u/s 234A of the Act for belated filing of return of income. Thereafter, the assessee moved an application u/s 154 of 2 M/s. M.P. Recycling Co. Pvt. Ltd.
the Act requesting the AO to reduce the interest u/s 234A of the Act on the plea that the assessee has filed return of income within the extended period. The AO rejected the petition by observing that the request of the assessee for extension of time was disposed of by the order sought to be rectified and assessee was bound to file return within the period specified in the notice.
The assessee preferred appeal before Ld CIT(A) challenging the rectification order. The Ld CIT(A) expressed the view that the provisions of sec. 153A do not give power to AO to extend the time limit and accordingly confirmed the interest charged u/s 234A of the Act, as charging of interest is mandatory. Aggrieved, the assessee has filed this appeal.
The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has paid self assessment tax before the due date of filing of return of income and the same should be considered while calculating interest u/s 234A of the Act. In this regard, he placed reliance on the Circular No.2/2015 (F No.385/03/2015-IT(B) dated 10- 02-2015 issued by the CBDT, wherein it was decided as under:-
“3. The Board has decided that no interest under section 234A of the Act is chargeable on the amount of self assessment tax paid by the assessee before the due date of filing of return of income”
We notice that the CBDT has followed the decision rendered by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Prannoy Roy (309 ITR 231). Accordingly, the Ld A.R prayed that the AO may be directed to re-compute the interest u/s 234A of the Act in accordance with the Circular referred above.
We heard Ld D.R, who submitted that the charging of interest u/s 234A is mandatory.
Having heard rival submissions, we are of the view that the issue relating to charging/computation of interest u/s 234A requires fresh examination at the end of the AO, as the assessee contends that the self assessment tax paid by it before the due date for filing return of income was not considered by the 3 M/s. M.P. Recycling Co. Pvt. Ltd.
AO. Accordingly we set aside the order passed by Ld CIT(A) and direct the AO to re-compute interest u/s 234A, if any, in accordance with the circular issued by CBDT (supra).
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order has been pronounced in the Court on 25.10.2017.
More judgments on Section 234A
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026