NIRANJANA K. TANNA,MUMBAI vs. DCIIT (OSD-II )CEN RG -7, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's rectification application was allowed and the penalty deleted. The revenue did not appeal against the rectification. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee subsequently filed a rectification application before the lower authorities, which was allowed, and the consequential penalty was deleted. Therefore, the assessee no longer wished to pursue the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal is maintainable when the underlying issues have been resolved through a rectification application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI D.T. GARASIA, JM & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
ITA.No.2822/Mum/2014 Niranjana K.Tanna Assessment Year-2005-06 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI "ी डी.टी. गरािसया,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद" के सम" । BEFORE SHRI D.T. GARASIA, JM AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2005-06) Niranjana K. Tanna Deputy Commissioner Of बनाम/ Tanna House,2nd Floor Income Tax(OSD-II) 11/A, Nathalal Parekh Marg Central Range-7 Vs. Colaba,Mumbai-400 039 Aaykar Bhavan,Mumbai-20 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. AACPT-2819-G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Assessee by : Niraj Sheth, Kamlesh Kureliya,Ld.AR’s Revenue by : V.Jenardhanan , Ld. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / : 26/10/2017 Date of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/11 /2017 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. The captioned appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [AY] 2005-06 assails the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-40 [CIT(A)], Mumbai, Appeal No. CIT(A)-40/DCIT(OSD- II)C.R.7/132/12-13 dated 21/01/2014. The assessment for impugned AY was framed by Ld. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax(OSD-II)
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026