ST. XAVIER'S COLLEGIATE SCHOOL TEACHERS' BENEVOLENT FUND,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Exemption)'s jurisdiction for registration under Section 12AA is limited to verifying the genuineness of the trust and its activities, not the application of funds or violation of Section 13. The CIT(Exemption) should have examined whether the activities were charitable in nature.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the application, stating the trust was closely held and not for the benefit of the general public.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) can reject registration under Section 12AA based on the trust being closely held and not for public benefit, or if the scope is limited to genuineness and charitable objectives.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust v. CIT47 citing382 ITR 399 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A”, BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
Appellant by :Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA Respondent by :Shri P.K. Srihani, CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date of Hearing : 09/04/2018 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 18/04/2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The captioned appeal filed by the assessee, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(Exemption)’], Kolkata u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2.In this appeal, the assessee is challenging the action of the ld. CIT(Exemption) rejecting registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The brief facts apropos this issue are that the assessee trust came into existence as a Trust vide Trust Deed dated 04.10.2016. The aforesaid trust filed an application in Form No.10A for registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on dated 28.02.2017.The CIT(Exemption) has refused registration u/s 12AA of the Act for the following reasons: (i).The assessee trust is very closely held trust and beneficiaries are also very limited and there was only one beneficiary of the trust till 30.04.2017, namely Shri Chittranjan Roy who was paid Rs.75,000/- on 26.12.2016. St. Xavier’s Collegiate School Teachers’ Benevolent Fund (ii).Trust is not for the benefit of the general public.
Therefore, considering the above reason, the ld. CIT(Exemption) held that since the trust is not for the benefit of the general publichence, he rejected the application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act.
4.Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(Exemption), the assessee is in appeal before us.
5.We have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record and after hearing the ld. DR for the Revenue, we are of the opinion that so far as grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act is concerned, the CIT(Exemption)’s jurisdiction is only to verify the objectives of the institution and genuineness of the activities, meaning thereby that, he has to satisfy himself that the objects are charitable in nature and the activities being carried on or to be carried on are genuine, meaning thereby that, they are in consonance for achieving of charitable object and nothing else. So far as the violation of provision of section 13 of the Act is concerned, that is for limited purpose of taxing that amount and denying benefit of section 11 and 12 of the Act but cannot be a reason for refusing to grant registration u/s 12A of the Act or cancel the registration of the trust u/s 12A of the Act. It is clear from reading of section 12A & 12AA of the Act that what is intended thereby is only a registration simpliciter of the entity of a trust. This has been made a condition precedent for claiming the benefits of exemption under the other provisions of the Act regarding exemption of income, contribution etc. No examination of the modus of the application of the funds of the Trust or an examination of the ethical background of its settlers is called for while considering an application for registration. The stage for consideration of the relevance of the object of the Trust and the application of its funds arises at the time of the assessment. Where benefits are claimed by the assessees in terms of section 11 & 12 of the Act, the question as to the nature of such contribution and income can be looked into. At the time of registration of the Trust, going by the binding judgments of the Apex Court, what is to be St. Xavier’s Collegiate School Teachers’ Benevolent Fund looked into is whether the Trust is a genuine one and whether it is a sham institution floated only to avail the benefits of exemption under the Act. For that, we rely on the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in the case of Shee Anjaneya Medical Trust (2016) 382 ITR 399 (Kerala) wherein the same propositions were upheld by the Hon’ble High Court. We note that the question whether the activities of the trust which was formed with the specific intention to carry on certain charitable activities, are actually charitable in nature or not, would not arise for consideration at the stage of grant of registration to the trust u/s 12AA of the Act. Going by the specific words in section 12AA of the Act, what is germane to the issue is only as to the genuineness of the Trust and its activities. We note that there is no such finding in the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Exemption) that activities of the trust were not genuine. Going by the provisions of section 12A and 12AA of the Act, we hold that the grounds raised by the ld. CIT(E ) (Registering Authority), explained in para 4 of our order, for rejecting of registration to the assessee trust cannot be sustained and ld. CIT(Exemption) ought to have examined whether activities of the trust are charitable in nature or not. Therefore, we direct the ld. CIT(Exemption) to examine the genuineness of the Trust and its activities and objectives and adjudicate the issue in accordance with law. Therefore, we allow this appeal for statistical purposes in terms of the discussion made (supra).
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 18/04/2018. (A. T. VARKEY) (A. L. SAINI) "या"यक सद"य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद"य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER कोलकाता /Kolkata; "दनांक/ Date: 18/04/2018 (RS, SPS) St. Xavier’s Collegiate School Teachers’ Benevolent Fund ITA Nos.2248/Kol/2017
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026