JOYFUL TIE-UP PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 6(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not being prosecuted diligently by the assessee. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that filing an appeal requires active pursuit.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing before the ITAT. Despite proper notice, the assessee neither appeared nor sought an adjournment. This was a pattern, as the assessee had also failed to appear before the CIT(A) for multiple hearings.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellant fails to appear for hearings despite proper notice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
None explicitly mentioned as the reason for dismissal was non-prosecution.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D”, BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM & DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant- Joyful Tie-up Pvt. Ltd. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent.- ITO, Ward-6(2), Kolkata 2. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A), Kolkata. 3. आयकर आयु�त / CIT 4. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, कोलकाता / DR, ITAT, Kolkata 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6.
//True Copy// By Order
Senior Private Secretary, Head of Office/D.D.O, I.T.A.T, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026