ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANGALORE vs. M/S.ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION, MANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that excess expenditure incurred for charitable purposes in earlier years can be adjusted against the income of subsequent years. This adjustment is considered as application of income in the subsequent year, aligning with established judicial precedents.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders allowing the assessee, an educational institution, to carry forward excess application of income to subsequent assessment years. The core issue was whether such carry forward is permissible under the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether excess application of income by a charitable trust in an earlier year can be carried forward and set off against the income of a subsequent year for the purpose of exemption under Section 11.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection398 citing264 ITR 110 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Shri Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal204 citing211 ITR 293 · 1995 · HC
- Income Tax v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS)188 citing131 Taxmann 386 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation153 citing164 ITR 439 · 1987 · HC
- Govindu Naicker Estate v. ADIT89 citing248 ITR 368 · 2001 · HC
- Deputy Director of Income-tax v. Jyothy Charitable Trust20 citing60 Taxmann.com 165 · 2015 · ITAT
- Govindu Naicker Estate v. Asstt. DIT12 citing105 Taxmann 719 · 1999 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CIRCUIT BENCH AT MANGALURU
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA
Per INTURI RAMA RAO, AM : These are appeals filed by the revenue directed against the orders of the CIT(A), Mangaluru, dated 20/09/2016 for the assessment years 2004-05, 2006-07 to 2012-13. 2. The only issue involved in all these appeals is whether the respondent-assessee is entitled to carry forward excess application of income to next assessment year. This issue is no to 2118/Bang/2016 Page 2 of 4 more res integra. It is covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the co-ordinate bench in the case of Jyothi Charitable Trust (60 taxmann.com 165)(Bang-Trib.) wherein it has been held as follows: “13. In the grounds of appeal, the Revenue has reiterated the stand of the AO that there is no provision in the Act to allow carry forward of excess application of income for set off as application of income in subsequent years. The ld. DR reiterated the stand of the Revenue as contained in the grounds of appeal.
14. We have considered his submission. Section 11(1)(a) does not contain any words of limitation to the effect that the income should have been applied for charitable or religious purpose only in the year in which the income has arisen. The application for charitable purposes as contemplated in section 11(1)(a) takes place in the year in which the income is adjusted to meet the expenses incurred for charitable or religious purposes. Hence, even if the expenses for such purposes have been incurred in the earlier years and the said expenses are adjusted against the income of a subsequent year, the income of such subsequent year can be said to be applied for charitable or religious purposes in the year in which such adjustment takes place. In other words, the set-off of excess of expenditure incurred over the income of earlier years against the income of a later year will amount to application of income of such later year. The above is the position of law as held in the case of CIT v. Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation [1987] 164 ITR 439/[1986] 29 Taxman 476 (Raj) and CIT v. Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal [1995] 211 ITR 293 (Guj.). In CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection [2003] 264 ITR 110/131 Taxman 386 (Bom.) it was held that in case of charitable trust whose income is exempt under s. 11, excess of expenditure in the earlier years can be adjusted against income of subsequent years and such adjustment would be application of income for subsequent years and that depreciation is allowable on the assets the cost of which has been fully allowed as application of income under s. 11 in past years. In Govindu Naicker Estate v. Asstt. DIT [2001] 248 ITR 368/[1999] 105 Taxman 719 (Mad.), the Hon'ble Madras High Court held that the income of the trust has to be arrived at having due regard to the commercial principles, that s. 11 is a benevolent provision, and that the expenditure incurred on religious or charitable purposes in earlier year or years can be adjusted against the income of the subsequent year. The principle that the loss incurred under one head can only be set off against the income to 2118/Bang/2016 Page 3 of 4 from the same head is not of any relevance, if the expenditure incurred was for religious or charitable purposes, and the expenditure adjusted against the income of the trust in a subsequent year, would not amount to an incidence of loss of an earlier year being set off against the profit of a subsequent year. The object of the religious and charitable trust can only be achieved by incurring expenditure and in order to incur that expenditure, the trust should have an income. So long as the expenditure incurred is on religious or charitable purposes, it is the expenditure properly incurred by the trust, and the income from out of which that expenditure is incurred, would not be liable to tax. The expenditure, if incurred in an earlier year is adjusted against the income of a later year, it has to be held that the trust had incurred expenditure on religious and charitable purposes from the income of the subsequent year, even though the actual expenditure was in the earlier years, if in the books of account of the trust such earlier expenditure had been set off against the income of the subsequent year. The expenditure that can be so adjusted can only be expenditure on religious and charitable purposes and no other. The High Court relied on the decision in the case of Society of Sisters of ST. Anne (supra ).
15. We are therefore of the view that there is no merit in ground Nos. 3 to 3.2 raised by the Revenue. Accordingly, the same are dismissed. ”
The decision of the CIT(A) is in consonance with the ratio laid down by the co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jyothi Charitable Trust (supra). Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the orders of the CIT(A).
In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026