TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD 2(3)(1), INCOME TAX
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal acknowledged the typographical error and clarified that paragraph 9 of the ITAT order dated 06.12.2023 should be considered for ground no. 1. For ground no. 4, it was held that Section 244A(1A) would apply from 01.06.2016 to the date of actual refund receipt.
What were the facts?
The assessee submitted that while adjudicating ground no. 1, the order inadvertently mentioned paragraphs 10-12 instead of paragraph 9 concerning interest on refund. Similarly, for ground no. 4, paragraph 9 of an earlier ITAT order was incorporated instead of paragraphs 10-12.
What were the issues?
Correction of typographical errors in the ITAT order regarding the relevant paragraphs for grounds 1 and 4, and the applicability of Section 244A(1A) for additional interest on refund.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Pfizer Ltd.78 citing191 ITR 626 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. HEG Ltd.63 citing324 ITR 331 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH : MUMBAI
Before: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Rahul Chaudhary]
Per Amarjit Singh, AM:
The assessee vide letter dated 09.07.2024 received on 22.07.2024 has submitted that while adjudicating ground no. 1 in respect of non-grant of interest on income tax refund till the date of receipt of actual refund inadvertently para 10 to 12 from the order of ITAT dated 06.02.2023 vide ITA No. 2362/M/2023 has been mentioned instead of para 9 of the order of ITAT which pertained to the issue raised in the aforesaid ground no. 1 of the order. Further, it is also reported that while adjudicating the ground no. 4 of the assessee pertaining to assessee in not granting interest u/s 244A of the Act inadvertently para no. 9 of the earlier order of the ITAT in the case of the assessee dated 06.12.2023 in ITA N
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 244A(1A)
- Itc Infotech India Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 2941/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2014-2015
- Nima Specific Family Trust, Ahmedabad vs Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 70/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Mar 2026AY 2013-14
- The South Indian Bank Limited, Thrissur vs DCIT, ThrissurITA 182/COCH/2025[2007-08]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2025AY 2007-08
- Viacom 18 Media Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 16(1)…ITA 1002/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed23 May 2025AY 2012-13
- Puranmal Delhiwala, Wadala, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 23(2)(6), MumbaiITA 3785/MUM/2024[1993-94]Status: Disposed21 May 2025AY 1993-94
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026