HDFC SECURITIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE , MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in its corrigendum, clarifies that the details of the order passed for the Assessment Year 2010-11 were incorrectly stated as Assessment Year 2007-08. The correction replaces the incorrect citation with the accurate Assessment Year 2010-11 and corresponding ITA numbers.
What were the facts?
This document is a corrigendum to a common order issued by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concerning cross-appeals for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15. The corrigendum rectifies specific errors in the original order regarding the assessment year and ITA numbers cited for an earlier appeal.
What were the issues?
Correction of factual errors in a previous tribunal order regarding assessment years and ITA numbers.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�ािपत �ित //True Copy// उप/सहायक पंजीकार /(Dy./Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, मुंबई / ITAT, Mumbai
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "E" BENCH, MUMBAI SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER (Assessment Year 2013-14) & (Assessment Year 2014-15)
HDFC Securities Limited, Office Floor 8, I Think Techno Campus, Kanjurmarg (East) - 400042 [PAN: AAACH8215R] ……………. Appellant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs (Appeals), Respondent National Faceless Appeal Centre ……………. & (Assessment Year 2013-14)
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 4(1)(1), Mumbai Room No. 640, 6th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 ……………. Appellant Vs HDFC Securities Limited, I- Think Techno Campus, Building – B, “Alpha” Office Floor 8, Near Kanjurmarg Station, Opp. Crompton Greaves, Kanjurmarg (East) - 400042 Respondent ……………. [PAN: AAACH8215R]
CORRIGENDUM 1. Cross Appeals for the Assessment Year 2013-14 [ITA No. 1887/Mum/2023 & and appeal preferred the Assessee for the AY 2014-15 [ITA were disposed off by way of common order, dated 11/03/2024.
While adjudication Ground No. III raised in & 1986/Mum/2023 Assessment Year: 2013-15 1887/Mum/2023 some mistakes had crept in been inadvertently. The details of order passed by the Tribunal in appeal for the Assessment Year 2010-11 were incorrectly stated as “Assessment Year 2007-08 [ITA No. 3137 & 3052/Mum/2014]”. The said mistake is hereby rectified by way of the present Corrigendum and accordingly the aforesaid phrase used in Paragraph 12.7 at page 9 & 10 of the aforesaid common, order dated 11/03/2024, shall stand replaced by and be read as “Assessment Year 2010-11 [ITA No. 3137 & 3502/Mum/2014]”.
It is ordered accordingly.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026