COOPER CORPORATION PVT. LTD.,SATARA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX : 3,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had applied for withdrawal of the appeal and the revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee subsequently filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn based on their application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
आदेश / ORDER
PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Pune dated 16.03.2016 relating to assessment year 2011-12 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’)
2 ITA No.1040/PUN/2016 A.Y. 2011-12
The assessee has filed an application dated 22.05.2018 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. DR for Revenue has raised no objection on assessee’s withdrawing the present appeal. In view of application made by assessee, the appeal is dismissed as having been 'withdrawn'.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 22nd day of May, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER
पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 22nd May, 2018 SB आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT-3, Pune. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, “बी” ब�च, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5.
// True Copy //
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
�नजी स�चव /Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026