PRADIP DATTATRAYA LANGDE,PUNE vs. COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX : 6,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the revenue had no objection to the withdrawal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as having been withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed against the revisionary order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, PUNE
आदेश / ORDER
PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Pune dated 30.03.2015 relating to assessment year 2010-11 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( in short ‘the Act’)
2 ITA No.1193/PUN/2015 A.Y. 2010-11
The assessee has filed an application dated 23.05.2018 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. DR for Revenue has raised no objection on assessee’s withdrawing the present appeal. In view of application made by assessee, the appeal is dismissed as having been 'withdrawn'.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on this 23rd day of May, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANIL CHATURVEDI) (SUSHMA CHOWLA) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER
पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 23rd May, 2018 SB आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT-6, Pune. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, “बी” ब�च, 4. पुणे / DR, ITAT, “B” Bench, Pune. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 5.
// True Copy // आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
�नजी स�चव /Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026