MAHESHWARI SAMAJ SANYOGITA GANJ SAMITI,INDORE vs. ITO, INDORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee does not wish to pursue the appeals and wants to withdraw them. The Departmental Representative has no objection to the withdrawal of appeals. The Tribunal allows the withdrawal of appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the Additional/Joint CIT(A)-2, Pune. The assessee later filed a written request stating that the issues in these appeals have been rectified by the CPC under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the appeals have become infructuous and the assessee wishes to withdraw them.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals have become infructuous due to rectification of issues by CPC and can be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
इम अपील� के संबंध म� �नधा�रती �वारा �ल�खत �नवेदन �दनांक 07.02.2026 दा�खल �कया गया है िजसम� �नवेदन �कया गया है �क इन अपील� म� अंत��त मु�द� को सीपीसी �वारा आयकर अ�ध�नयम, 1961 के अनुबंध� के अधीन प�रशोधन आदेश (rectification order) पा�रत करके सुधारा गया है । चूं�क �नधा�रती क� �शकायत� का उ�चत �प से �नराकरण हो गया है, अतः ये अपील� �न�फल (infructuous) हो गई है । अतः
आ.अ.सं. 902 तथा 903/इंदौर/2025 2 महे�वर� समाज संयो�गतागंज स�म�त, इंदौर �नधा�रती वत�मान अपील� का अनुसरण करने का इ�छुक नह�ं है और अपील� वा�पस लेना चाहता है । अतः �नधा�रती ने उपरो�त कारण से वत�मान अपील� को वापस �लए जाने क� अनुम�त �दान करने का अनुरोध �कया है । 3. �व�वान �वभागीय ��त�न�ध ने �नवेदन �कया �क उ�ह� कोई आप�� नह�ं है य�द �नधा�रती को वत�मान अपील� वा�पस �लए जाने क� अनुम�त द� जाती है ।
दोन� प�� के उपरो�त �नवेदन� क� �ि�ट म� हम इन अपील� को वा�पस �लए जाने क� अनुम�त �दान करते ह� तथा इ�ह� वा�पस �लए जाने के कारण खा�रज करते ह� । 5. प�रणामतः, �नधा�रती क� अपील� वा�पस �लए जाने के कारण खा�रज क� जाती ह� । यह आदेश 17.02.2026 को सुनवाई के प�चात खुले �यायालय म� उ�घो�षत �कया गया तथा त�प�चात �ल�खत आदेश पा�रत �कया गया ।
ह�ता/- ह�ता/- (बी.एम.�बयाणी) (परेश एम.जोशी) लेखा सद�य �या�यक सद�य �दनांक : 17.02.2026 ��त�ल�प : अपीलाथ�, ��यथ�, आयकर आयु�त (अपील), आयकर आयु�त, �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, गाड� फाईल
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026