ITO, WARD-2(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. M/S. KENDWA PACHAI SHOP, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1274/KOL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata08 June 2018AY 2012-136 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the payments made by depositing cash into the supplier's bank account were covered under the exceptions provided in Rule 6DD(b) and 6DD(k) of the Income Tax Rules. The supplier was considered a State Government establishment and an agent of the State Government for the supply of country spirit.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a country spirit shop, made cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 to a supplier, M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Ltd., by depositing cash directly into their bank account. The Assessing Officer disallowed these payments under Section 40A(3) for violating cash payment rules.

What were the issues?

Whether cash payments made to a wholesale licensee of country spirit, deposited directly into the licensee's bank account, are disallowable under Section 40A(3) for violating cash payment norms.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 40A(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH (D

Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, AM & Shri A.T. Varkey, JM]

order

: June 08, 2018 ORDER

PER P.M. JAGTAP, AM

1.

This appeal preferred by the revenue is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Asansol dated 22.03.2017 and the solitary issue involved therein relates to the deletion by the Ld. CIT(A) of the addition of Rs. 1,07,14,621/- made by the A.O. by way of disallowance under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

The assessee in the present case is a partnership firm which is engaged in running a country spirit shop. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 30.09.2012. As noticed by the A.O. during the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee firm had made purchases from M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Ltd. during the year under consideration and payments against the same were made by depositing cash directly in the bank account of M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Ltd. aggregating to Rs.

Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Kendwa Pachai Shop 1,07,14,621/. Since the said payments made in cash exceeding Rs. 20,000/- were in contravention of section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the assessee could not explain any exceptional circumstances as specified under Rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules, 1962 for making such payments, he made a disallowance of Rs. 1,07,14,621/- under section 40A(3) of the Act.

3.

The disallowance made by the A.O. under section 40A(3) was challenged by the assessee in the appeal filed before the Ld. CIT(A) and by relying on certain decisions of the Tribunal on a similar issue, the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the disallowance made by the AO u/s 40A(3) holding that the cash deposited by the assessee in the account of M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Ltd. for purchase of country spirit would fall in the category of exceptions as provided under Rule 6DD of the Income Tax, 1962. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal.

4.

We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. It is observed that the issue involved in this appeal of the revenue relating to disallowance under section 40A(3) is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the various decisions of this Tribunal. In one of such cases, namely M/s. Amrai Pachwai & C.S. Shop decided by the Tribunal vide its order dated 15.01.2014 passed in payments were made by the assessee against purchases made from the same party, namely M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packing Co. Pvt. Limited by depositing the cash directly in the bank account of the said supplier in the sums exceeding Rs. 20,000/- and Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Kendwa Pachai Shop the disallowance made for the same under section 40A(3) was deleted by the Tribunal for the following reasons given in paragraphs no. 21 & 22 of its order: “21. We find that M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Pvt. Ltd. is a bottling plant cum warehouse under Rule 2(vii) of the West Bengal Excise Rules, 2005 with privilege granted u/s 22 of The Bengal Excise Act, 1909. At this juncture, it would be relevant to go into the definition of warehouse as provided under the State Excise Rules, 2005, as below:- “Warehouse”, under Rule 2(vii) of the W.B. Excise Rules, 2005, means the warehouse for supply of country spirit to retail vendors, established at convenient places by the Commissioner at the expense of the State Government, or at the expense of a person to whom the exclusive privilege of supplying or selling country spirit by wholesale has been granted under section 22 of the Act, or of a licensed wholesale vendor of country spirit.

The above definition makes it clear that the 'warehouse' referred to under the State Excise Rules is under the direct control and authority of the Commissioner of State Excise because it is established by the Commissioner of State Excise and as such is a State Government establishment. It is also pertinent to note that the expenditure in relation to such warehouse is borne by the State Government or by the licensee to whom the exclusive privilege is granted u/s 22 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909. Hence there could be no doubt that the warehouse is established by the State Excise Commissioner. Hence it could be safely concluded that the warehouse so established by the State Excise Commissioner is a State Government establishment. It would also be pertinent to note that the said warehouse has been specifically established for supply of country spirit to retail vendors (assessee herein) only and not to anybody else. It would be pertinent to look into the definition of 'Wholesale licensee" as per Rule 2(viii) of the Excise Rules 2005 as below.- Rule 2(viii) - "Wholesale licensee" means the wholesale vendor of country spirit to whom licence has been granted in West Bengal Excise Form No.

26.

It would be pertinent to look into Section 22 of The Bengal Excise Act. 1909 at this juncture as below:- Section 22 - Grant of exclusive privilege of manufacture and sale of country liquor or intoxicating drugs – (1) The State Government may grant to any person, on such conditions and for such period as it may think fit, the exclusive privilege – (a) of manufacturing, or supplying by wholesale, or (b) of manufacturing, and supplying by wholesale, or Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Kendwa Pachai Shop (c) of selling, by wholesale or retail. or (d) of manufacturing or supplying by wholesale and selling retail, or (e) of manufacturing and supplying by wholesale and selling retail, any country liquor or intoxicating drug within any specified local area:

Provided that public notice shall be given to the intention to grant any such exclusive privilege. and that any objections made by any person residing within the area affected shall be considered before an exclusive privilege is granted.

(2) No grantee of any privilege under sub-section (1) shall exercise the same unless or until he has received a license in that behalf from the Collector or the Excise Commissioner.

Hence it could be safely concluded that M/s. Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Pvt Ltd (Bottling Plant) is a warehouse within the meaning of Rule 2(vii) of the Excise Rules 2005 and said warehouse is a State Government establishment, established and controlled by the Excise Commissioner. It would be relevant to reproduce Rule 6DD(b) of the IT Rules at this juncture;- (b) where the payment is made to the Government and, under the rules framed by it, such payment is required to be made in legal tender.

In the instant case, the assessee (retail vendor) had made cash payments for purchase of country spirit by depositing cash directly into the bank account of M/s ABPL as per Rule 6(2) of the Excise Rules 2005 , it has to be construed as payment made to the State Government authority and accordingly falls under the exception provided in Rule 6DD(b) of the IT Rules.

22.

It is not in dispute that M/s Asansol Bottling & Packaging Co. Pvt Ltd have been granted licence to act as a wholesaler for supply of country liquor to the retail vendor as per the regulations of the Excise Department, Government of West Bengal. At the cost of repetition, we would like to state that the said regulation mandated the payments to be made directly into the bank account of the said wholesale licensee by the retail vendor (i.e assessee herein) for strict and effective regulation of the country liquor and for prevention of spurious stocks and black marketing transactions from the same. Hence it could be safely concluded that the said wholesale licensee had acted at the instance of the State Government. Once this is so, then the said wholesale licensee could be construed as an agent of the State Government. For the sake of convenience, the relevant rule is reproduced hereunder:-

Rule 6DD(k) - where the payment is made by any person to his agent who is required to make payment in cash for goods or services on behalf of such person.

Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/s. Kendwa Pachai Shop The payment made by the assessee retail vendor to the Principal, Government of West Bengal through its wholesale agent. The relationship between the assessee (authorized retailer) and Government of West Bengal (the supplier) acting under West Bengal Excise Rules through its Authorised Wholesaler Licensee (Agent), both defacto and dejure, is one of 'Principal' and 'Agent'. We hold that the assessee retail vendor had made payment to the said agent (wholesale licensee) would fall under the exception provided in Rule 6DD(k) of the Rules”.

5.

As the issue involved in the present case as well as the all material facts relevant thereto are similar to the case of M/s. Amrai Pachwai & C.S. Shop (supra), we respectfully follow the decision rendered by the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the said case and delete the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) under section 40A(3) of the Act.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 8th June, 2018.

More judgments on Section 40A(3)

All 3,278 judgments and leading authorities on Section 40A(3) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →