DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(1), CHENNAI vs. FINANCIAL SOFTWARE & SYSTEMES PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal has corrected a clerical error in its previous order. The Assessment Year mentioned in the cause title of the order has been amended from 2011-12 to 2012-13.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order. The original appeal was filed for Assessment Year 2011-12. The corrigendum corrects the Assessment Year to 2012-13.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was a clerical error in the Assessment Year mentioned in the cause title of the ITAT's order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
In the Tribunal’s order dated 28.11.2017, in the above appeal, the Assessment Year mentioned in the cause title is to be read as “2012-13”, instead of “2011-12”.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026