INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), KANPUR vs. SHRI ASHOK KUMAR MAHESHWARI, KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessees had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and tax arrears were settled. The Revenue's appeals were therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) for various assessment years. The assessees had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the designated authority had passed orders for full and final settlement of tax arrears.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessees have settled their tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “B”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
These are Revenue’s appeals against the respective order of the ld. CIT(A)-I, Kanpur, for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2015-16, relating to four different assessees.
The assessees have moved applications, vide which it has been submitted that the Income Tax Department has passed Orders in Form No.5 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The assessees have filed the copies of Form No.5, i.e., the orders of the PCIT-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the DTVSVA, 2020, for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2015-16. It was contended that since the assessees have opted for Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and tax payable on the Departmental appeals has been deposited and orders for final settlement of tax arrears have been passed by the designated authority, therefore, the appeals filed by the Department may be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld. D. R. has no objection. Accordingly, since orders have been passed by the PCIT-1, Kanpur for full and final settlement of tax arrears under section 5(2) read with section 6 of the DTVSVA, 2020, for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2015-16, the appeals of the Department in to 87/LKO/2020 are ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 05/04/2022.
More judgments on Section 5(2)
- Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Jaipur vs Kavita Khanwani, BeawarITA 867/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT Circle-3(1)(1), International… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1908/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1514/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Gurgaon vs DCIT Circle 3(1)(1) International Taxation…ITA 1513/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-3(1)(1) International Taxation… vs Toyota Tsusho Corporation, GurgaonITA 1508/DEL/2020[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026