DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -23(1), MUMBAI vs. LAXMI FINANCE AND LEASING COMPANIES CO-OP. SOCIETY LTD, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the municipal rateable value should be adopted for computing the annual value of vacant properties, upholding the CIT(A)'s direction. Regarding transfer fees, the Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's decision in ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., holding that such fees are not taxable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative society, earned rental income from let-out properties and also received transfer fees. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for both rental income and transfer fees, which the Commissioner (Appeals) deleted. The Revenue appealed this deletion.
What were the issues?
Whether transfer fees received by a co-operative society are taxable as income, and how the annual value of vacant properties should be determined.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(17)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Gursahai Saigal v. CIT112 citing48 ITR 1 · 1963 · SC · Read judgment
- Narendra & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.10 869 citing7 SCC 714 · 2011
- CIT v. Ajax Products Ltd.63 citing60 ITR 392 · 1965 · SC
- Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Price Waterhouse58 citing3 SCC 722 · 2002
- 105 ITR 92 (SC); Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra27 citing4 SCC 378 · 1975 · SC
- 123 Taxman 790/256 ITR 73 (Raj.); Vivek Jain v. Asstt. CIT22 citing14 Taxmann.com 146 · 2011 · HC
- ITO v. Venkatesh Premises Co-operative Society Ltd.10 citing402 ITR 670 · 2018 · SC
- IRC v. Bladnoch Distillery Co. Ltd.8 citing12 STC 182 · 1961 · SC
- Sachin R. Tendulkar v. DCIT8 citing172 ITR 266 · 2018
- 216 ITR 3215 citing216 ITR 321 · 1995 · HC
- (supra) Saraswati Sugar Mills v. Haryana State Board5 citing1 SCC 418 · 1992
- 12th March, 2018. 3. Hatkesh Co–operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 21 (1)4 citing75 Taxmann.com 39 · 2016 · HC
- Bhaiji v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Thandla4 citing1 SCC 692 · 2003
- Gurudevdatta VKSSS Maryadit v. State of Maharashtra4 citing4 SCC 534 · 2001
- Somu Realtors Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT4 citing173 ITR 82 · HC
- 12 STC 182 (SC); CIT v. V. MR. P. Firm, Muar, AIR 1965 SC 12163 citing105 ITR 92 · 1976 · SC
- 84 Taxmann.com 2403 citing84 Taxmann.com 240
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘SMC‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SMT RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s.
Laxmi Finance of Income Tax-23(1)
And Leasing Company Room No.511, Fifth Co-op Society Ltd.
Floor, Piramal Laxmi Towres, Chambers, Lalbaug Plot C-25 Maharashtra-400 012 BKC, Bandra East Maharashtra-400 051 PAN/GIR No.AAAJL0006F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) CO No.125/Mum/2024 (Arising out of ITA No.4232/Mum/2023) (Assessment Year :2014-15) M/s. Laxmi Finance Vs. Deputy Commissioner of And Leasing Income Tax-23(1)
Company Co-op Room No.511, Fifth Floor, Society Ltd.
Piramal Chambers, Laxmi Towres, Lalbaug Plot C-25 Maharashtra-400 012 BKC, Bandra East Maharashtra-400 051 PAN/GIR No.AAAJL0006F (Appellant) .. (Respondent)
Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s.
Laxmi Finance of Income Tax-23(1)
And Leasing Company Room No.511, Fifth Co-op Society Ltd.
Floor, Piramal Laxmi Towres, Chambers, Lalbaug Plot C-25 M/s. Laxmi Finance and Leasing Company Co-operative Society Ltd., Maharashtra-400 012 BKC, Bandra East Maharashtra-400 051 PAN/GIR No.AAAJL0006F (Appellant) .. (Respondent) CO No.126/Mum/2024 (Arising out of ITA No.4233/Mum/2023)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 23(1)(a)
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3412/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3411/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- DCIT CC 5.4, Mumbai vs Wadhwagroup Holdings Private Limited, MumbaiITA 3410/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shakir Hussain Qureshi, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4187/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2022-23
- Income Tax Officer Ward 5 3 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Sai Palace Hotels Pvt.Ltd, MumbaiITA 472/MUM/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed15 Jul 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026