S.B.I H.R SECTION (ADMIN OFFICE),KANPUR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), KANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the delay of five days was not significant and the CIT(A) should have decided the appeals on merits. The appeals were remitted back to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the State Bank of India against orders of the CIT(A). The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals as being filed beyond the statutory period of 30 days.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals were rightly dismissed in limine for a minor delay, or if they should have been decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER BENCH:
These are appeals filed by two different assessees against separate orders of learned CIT(A) dated 09/11/2016.
& 75/Lkw/2017 Assessment Year:2013-14 2
These appeals have been dismissed by learned CIT(A) by holding that these appeals were filed beyond the statutory period of 30 days as prescribed u/s 249 of the I.T. Act. The learned CIT(A), while dismissing the appeals, has held that one of the counsel of the assessee had explained the reason for delay being illness of his wife whereas another counsel claimed that the delay had occurred due to the fact that the papers were got mixed in his office. However, we find that the delay as noted by learned CIT(A) is of five days which is not a significant delay and learned CIT(A) should have decided the appeals on merits instead of dismissing the same in limine. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to remit these appeals to learned CIT(A) with the direction to decide the appeals after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and in accordance with law.
In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 27/04/2022)
Sd/. Sd/. ( A. D. JAIN ) ( T. S. KAPOOR ) Vice President Accountant Member
More judgments on Section 249
- Sanjay Mishra, Rewa vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1, RewaITA 82/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 22/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 21/JAB/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S. Kalindi Ispat Pvt. Ltd., BilaspurITSSA 17/JAB/2018[2009-10]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2009-10
- Sanjay Mishra, Rewa vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1, RewaITA 82/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026