U P STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,LUCKNOW vs. PCIT, LUCKNOW - 1
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Since the assessee had no further grievance after the Assessing Officer's subsequent order, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the PCIT under section 263. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed an order under section 143(3)/263, accepting the original assessment, leaving the assessee with no grievance.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against the PCIT's order under section 263 is maintainable when the subsequent order by the AO has resolved the assessee's grievance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. A. D. JAIN & SHRI T. S. KAPOOR
PER A.D. JAIN, V.P.: This is assessee’s appeal against the order of the ld. PCIT, Lucknow, dated 18.3.2021 passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has moved an application dated Nil, received by the Registry of this office on 17.5.2022, for withdrawal of the appeal, stating therein that pursuant to the impugned order of the PCIT passed under section 263 of the I.T. Act, the Assessing Officer passed an order, dated 30.3.2022 under section 143(3)/263 of the I.T. Act, accepting the income originally assessed and thus, there is no grievance by the assessee. He, accordingly, submitted that that assessee may be allowed to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal. The ld.
D.R. has no objection to such request. In the light of the request of the assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19/05/2022.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026