NEEM KA THANA EDUCATION SOCIETY,NEEM KA THANA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal observed that the applicant had not fully complied with the directions of the CIT(E) and had failed to furnish necessary replies and documents. However, considering the subsequent registration under the RPT Act and the request for another opportunity, the tribunal deemed it fit to restore the application.
What were the facts?
The appellant filed an application for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iv)(B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) dismissed the application on grounds of non-compliance with notices, non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, and non-genuineness of activities. The applicant society subsequently obtained registration under the RPT Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(iv)(B) should be restored to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision, considering the subsequent registration under the RPT Act and the applicant's request for another opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv)(B),Section 10,Section 11 & 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A-Bench” JAIPUR
Consequently, this is appeal is disposed for statistical purposes and the matter is remitted to the files of Learned CIT(E), for decision afresh, after providing another opportunity to the applicant society, of being heard. File be consigned to the record room after the needful is done by the office. Order to be pronounced under Rule 34(4) of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 by placing the details on the notice board. Sd/- Sd/-
¼vUuiw.kkZ xqIrk½ ¼ujsUnz dqekj½ (ANNAPURNA GUPTA ) (NARINDER KUMAR) ys[kk lnL; @Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member fnukad@Dated:- 05/01/2026 *Santosh आदेश की प्रतिलिपिअग्रेf’ात@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू The Appellant- Neem Ka Thana Education Society, Neem Ka Thana. 1. 2. izR;FkhZ@ The Respondent- CIT(E), Jaipur.
More judgments on Section 10
- Integrated People Development Project… vs CIT Exemptions, ChennaiITA 2970/CHNY/2026[-]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Shivashankrappa Sahukar, Kalaburagi vs ITO, Ward-1, KalaburgaiITA 155/BANG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Jagrutiben Manishbhai Trivedi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 6(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2644/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Jagrutiben Manishbhai Trivedi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 6(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2643/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Prabhakar Golkonda, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 9(1), HyderabadITA 994/HYD/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026