UNION BANK OF INDIA,MUMBAI vs. DCIT LTU (2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amended Section 115JB(2)(b) does not apply to the assessee banks. The High Court's decision in the assessee's own case, which held that the computation machinery provisions of Section 115JB failed for the banks, remains applicable.
What were the facts?
The appeals concern whether Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, particularly after its amendment in 2012, applies to nationalized banks like Union Bank of India and Central Bank of India. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) held that the amended provisions bring these banks within the scope of Section 115JB.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is whether nationalized banks, as 'corresponding new banks', are brought under the purview of Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act following the 2012 amendment, and if the computation provisions are applicable to them.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing128 ITR 294 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Union Bank of India41 citing105 Taxmann.com 253 · 2019 · HC
- UCO Bank v. DCIT20 citing64 Taxmann.com 51 · 2015 · ITAT
- Damodar Valley Corpn v. Addl. CIT14 citing66 Taxmann.com 25 · 2016 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SPECIAL BENCH’
Before: JUSTICE (Retd.) SHRI C.V. BHADANGSHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI AMIT SHUKLA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): In the aforesaid cases, this Special Bench has been constituted for adjudication of following question of law which is permeati
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026