SOCIETY OF THE MOST BLESSED SACRAMENT AND SACRED HEART OF JESUS ,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that CBDT circulars had extended the time for filing applications in form 10AB. The Assessee's application, filed on 28.09.2023, was within the extended limitation period as per CBDT circular no. 07/2024.
What were the facts?
The Assessee, a society, sought registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act by filing form 10AB. Their previous application for registration under section 12A was rejected due to non-submission of documents. The current application was filed on 28.09.2023.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessee's application for registration in form 10AB was maintainable within the extended timeline provided by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 05.03.2024, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) (in short Ld. Commissioner) under section 12AA/12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2023-24.
The Assessee, being a society, by filing an application on 28.09.2023 in form 10AB of the Act sought registration u/s 12AB of the Act before the Ld. Commissioner. On perusing the material available on record the Ld. Commissioner observed that the Assessee has already filed application in form 10AB for regularization of the provisional registration M/s. Society Of The Most Blessed Sacrament And Sacred Heart of Jesus u/s 12A on 15.04.2022 which was rejected vide order dated 30.10.2022 for non submission of the required documents in the prescribed time. Further, the Assessee has filed fresh application in form 10AB when the window of e-filing the application was opened for the trusts which have not filed applications within six months of the activities or six months before the expiry of the provisional registration. The Ld. Commissioner by giving reason, “the filing of the fresh application is not under circular No.06/2023 dated 24.05.2023, hence this application in form 10AB is not maintainable. In the conclusion this application for grant of registration stands rejected”.
The Assessee, being aggrieved, is in appeal before us and at the outset drew our attention to the provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act dated 24.02.2022. The Assessee further drew our attention to the CBDT circular No.6/2023 with regard to the clarification qua charitable religious trust by which the time for filing fresh application in form 10AB was extended up to 30.09.2023 and therefore by Circular no 07/2024 extended upto 30-06-2024. Therefore, the Assessee has claimed that the application in form 10AB filed by the Assessee on 28.09.2023 is within the limitation period as extended by the CBIDT vide circular (supra).
The Ld. D.R. did not refute the said fact.
Hence, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances in totality, as the Assessee has filed the relevant application in form 10AB on 28.09.2023, admittedly within the limitation period as extended by the CBDT (supra) vide circular no. 07/2024, hence impugned order is set aside and the case is remanded to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh on merits suffice to say by affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the Assessee.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23.09.2024.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026