PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-7 vs. TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD.
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that a similar appeal for AY 2013-14 had already been dismissed. Therefore, the present appeal was also dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order concerning AY 2014-2015, which followed a previous ITAT decision for AY 2013-14. The Revenue's counsel could not point out any perversity in the ITAT's findings regarding comparables.
What were the issues?
Whether the ITAT's findings on comparables were perverse and if the current appeal should follow the fate of a previously dismissed appeal for an earlier assessment year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 391/2025
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-7 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC, Mr. Gibran, JSC, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Rishabh Nangia and Mr. Gibran, Advs.
versus
TUPPERWARE INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tanya and Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R %
09.09.2025 CM APPL. 56697/2025 1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 56698/2025 and CM APPL. 56699/2025
For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 109 days in filing and 112 days in re-filing, is condoned. 4. The applications are disposed of. ITA 391/2025 5. This appeal by revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:34:00
1961(the Act) lays a challenge to an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 8135/Del/2018 filed by the respondent assessee in respect of AY 2014-2015 wherein ITAT has followed its own decision in ITA No. 7580/Del/2017 in respect of respondent assessee for the Assessment Year 2013-14 decided on 01.08.2022. 6. Mr. Puneet Rai, Senior Standing Counsel fairly draws our attention to an order dated 14.03.2024 passed in ITA No. 304/2023 by which the appeal has been dismissed by this Court. Further, Mr. Rai could not point out any perversity in the findings of the ITAT in respect of comparables. 7. In view of the fact that the appeal for the AY 2013-14 has been rejected, this appeal shall also follow the same fate. 8. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
VINOD KUMAR, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:34:00
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026