RAM NIWAS SINGH,RANCHI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, ASSESSMENT UNIT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessment order was passed under Section 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was also observed that the NFAC/CIT(A)'s order was ex-parte due to non-compliance by the assessee. However, considering the principles of natural justice, the Tribunal decided to grant one final opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed against an ex-parte order passed by the NFAC/CIT(A) for AY 2018-19. The assessee did not appear for the hearing, although the notice was duly served. The Revenue's representative made submissions, and the matter was heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte order passed by NFAC/CIT(A) due to non-compliance by the assessee should be upheld or set aside to provide a final opportunity for hearing on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH(SMC
Before: SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY
Assessee represented by None Department represented by Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr.DR Date of hearing 27/01/2025 Date of pronouncement 04/02/2025 O R D E R PER: PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC)/learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short, the ld. CIT(A)] dated 16/05/2024 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 as per the grounds of appeal on record.
2. At the time of hearing, none has appeared on behalf of assessee, though, the notice of hearing have been duly served as per registered address.
3. Submissions of the learned Senior Departmental Representative (ld. Sr.DR) for the revenue are recorded and the matter is taken as heard.
4. I have given careful consideration to the relevant documents on record and the submissions of the learned. Sr.DR for the revenue. It is observed that the order of assessment has been passed under Section 147 r.w.s 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). That further from para 4 of the ld. CIT(A), it is found that it is an ex parte order passed by the Ram Niwas Singh Vs AO NFAC/CIT(A) for the reason that there was no compliance by the assessee. Therefore, the rights and liabilities of the parties herein have not been adjudicated substantially. It is correct that reasonable opportunities have been provided to the assessee, still, there was no compliance. The facts remain that the income tax laws are within the ambit of welfare legislation which are absolutely separate from penal legislation and therefore, given the facts and circumstances and as per applicable law, benefit of doubt has to be attributed to the assessee/tax payer. There may be circumstances beyond the control of assessee or "vis major" because of which the assessee may not have able to comply with the notices before the NFAC/ld. CIT(A). Under the given facts on record, which cannot be said that such non-compliance was deliberate or malafide on the part of assessee. Therefore, in the interest of principles of natural justice, I am inclined to provide one final opportunity to the assessee and accordingly the order of NFAC/ld.CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is remanded back to its file for de novo adjudication and the assessee is also directed that this being the final opportunity, he should file all the relevant documents before NFAC/ld. CIT(A) and represent his case on merits. As per the above terms, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes only.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026