CITY AS LAB FONDATION,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS),MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the definition of 'education' under Section 2(15) is broad and not limited to formal schooling. It also found that the assessee did not charge fees from students or government schools, and the nominal fees from private schools did not indicate a profit motive.
What were the facts?
The assessee, City As Lab Foundation, applied for registration under Section 12AB and 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, stating the assessee was not affiliated with any board/university and was providing education for a fee with a profit motive.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's activities qualify as 'education' under Section 2(15) and whether it operates with a profit motive.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- Gujarat State Co-operative Union v. CIT58 citing195 ITR 279 · 1992 · HC
- DIT v. Ahmedabad Management Association36 citing366 ITR 85 · 2014 · HC
- DIT (Exemptions) v. Chartered Accountants Study Circle6 citing23 Taxmann.com 444 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH
PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against separate order passed by ld. CIT(Exemption) Mumbai rejecting the application u/s.12AA and 80G vide order dated 22/02/2024. 2. The brief facts are that assessee company was incorporated under Companies Act, 2013 u/s.8(1) of the Companies Act. The assessee company was originally incorporated with the following objects:- i.
To promote the activities of research & development among the school children by enabling them to use their city as a lab
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026