LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5(4), MUMBAI (EARLIER AO DCIT, CIRCLE 11(5) BANGLORE ., MUMBAI

ITA 4551/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 October 2024AY 2011-12Bench: SMT. BEENA PILLAI (Judicial Member), SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the payments made by the assessee to its holding company were in the nature of reimbursement of expenses for deputed employees and were incurred in the course of business. Therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was incorrect.

What were the facts?

The assessee, L&T Valdel Engineering Ltd. (now Larsen & Toubro Ltd.), claimed deduction for amounts paid to its holding company, L&T Ltd., as reimbursement for ESOP benefits provided to deputed employees. The Assessing Officer disallowed this deduction.

What were the issues?

Whether the reimbursement of ESOP costs to a holding company for deputed employees constitutes a deductible business expense. Whether forward contracts entered into by an exporter to hedge foreign exchange fluctuations are speculative transactions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(18)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Heard together (8 matters)

I.T.A. No.4551/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4552/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4553/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4554/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4555/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4684/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4767/Mum/2023
I.T.A. No.4682/Mum/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JM & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, AM I.T.A. No.4552/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No.4554/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year: 2014-15)

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (successor to ACIT, CC-5(4) (earlier AO L&T Valdel Engineering Ltd.) DCIT, Circle-11(5), Bangalore), L&T House, N.M. Marg, Vs.

Room No. 1927, 19th Floor, Mumbai-400001. Air India Building, PAN : AAACL0140P Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 I.T.A. No.4767/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) DCIT, CC-5(4) , L and T Valdel Engineering Ltd.

Room No. 1927, 19th Floor, RMG Galleria, 5th Floor, Opp. To Air India Building, Yelahanka Police Station, Vs.

Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 Bangalore Bellary Road, Yelahanaka, Bangaluru-560064. PAN : AABCL0552G DCIT, CC-5(4) , Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (earlier Room No. 436, 4th Floor, known as L&T Valdel Kautilya Bhawan, Bandra Kurla Engineering Ltd.)

Vs.

Complex, Mumbai-400

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 43(5)

All 524 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →