ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CEN CIR 7(2), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. HEGDE AND HEGDE PHARMACEUTICA LLP, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that conference registration charges paid by the pharmaceutical company on behalf of doctors are to be treated as 'freebies' and are not allowable as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the IT Act. The decision of the Supreme Court in Apex Laboratories was considered binding.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a pharmaceutical company, incurred expenses on freebies to medical professionals, including survey fees, conference registration, and distribution of scientific books. The Assessing Officer disallowed these expenses, considering them in violation of MCI guidelines and Section 37(1) of the IT Act. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance for conference registration expenses but deleted others.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses incurred by a pharmaceutical company for conference registration fees paid on behalf of doctors are allowable as a business deduction under Section 37(1) of the IT Act, considering them as freebies.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT148 citing135 Taxmann.com 286 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Dy. CIT v. PHL Pharma (P.) Ltd.38 citing163 ITD 10 · 2017 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI “E” BENCH : MUMBAI
Before: SHRI B.R. BASKARAN & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
PER BENCH :
These cross appeals are related to AY 2016-17 to 2022-23 and
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026