THE INCOME TAX OFFICER -1, RAIGARH(CG) vs. SHRI SHRI MANISH SHUKLA L/H OF LATE, RAIGARH(CG)
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the tax effect was indeed below Rs. 20 lakhs. Following the CBDT circular which raised the monetary limits for appeals, the Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A). The assessee argued that the tax effect was below Rs. 20 lakhs, making the appeal not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the latest CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER R. K. PANDA, AM : This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 28.03.2016 of CIT(A), Bilaspur (CG) relating to assessment year 2008-09. 2. The ld. counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submitted that the tax effect involved in the grounds raised by the Revenue is below Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, in view of the latest CBDT Circular No.03/2018 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt)] dated 11th July, 2018 which is applicable even to pending appeals, the appeal filed by the Revenue is not maintainable.
2
The ld. DR on the other hand fairly conceded that the tax effect involved
in the grounds raised by the Revenue is admittedly below Rs.20 lakhs.
We have heard the rival submis
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026