MITSUI KINZOKU COMPONENTS PVT LTD,REWARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD TWO
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the beneficial tax rate under the India-Japan DTAA. It directed the Assessing Officer to charge tax at 10% on the distributed dividends, allowing the refund of excess DDT paid.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an Indian subsidiary, paid Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) at 16.61% on dividends paid to its Japanese parent company. Following Supreme Court and Tribunal decisions, the assessee sought a refund of excess DDT, claiming the India-Japan DTAA rate of 10% should apply.
What were the issues?
Whether the beneficial tax rate under the India-Japan DTAA is applicable to Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) paid by an Indian company to its foreign parent, and if a refund can be claimed for excess DDT paid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- DCIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.115 citing149 Taxmann.com 332 · 2023 · ITAT
- Union of India v. Tata Tea Co Ltd.38 citing85 Taxmann.com 346 · 2017 · SC
- Seshammal v. ITO11 citing237 ITR 185 · 1999 · HC
- Deep Chand Jain v. ITO8 citing15 Taxmann 522 · 1984 · HC
- Cosmo Films Ltd. v. CBDT6 citing108 Taxmann.com 49 · 2019 · HC
- Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income-tax (System)4 citing169 Taxmann.com 506 · 2024 · HC
- Gopalan Thygarajan v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai-V4 citing89 Taxmann.com 187 · 2018 · HC
- Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax3 citing70 Taxmann 206 · 1993 · HC
- Tara Exports v. Union of India3 citing98 Taxmann.com 363 · 2018 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, D: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
These three appeals by the assessee are against the respective orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as ‘’the Ld. CIT(A)] all dated 26.06.2024, pertaining to Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2011-12, 2012-
ITA Nos.- 3910, 3911,3912/Del/2024 Mitsui Kinzoku Components India Pvt. Ltd. 13 and 2013-14 arising out of common order dated 21.09.2021 passed by the Assessing Officer, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the AO’) rejecting the application of the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115-O
- Wpp Media India Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 9297/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- DCIT, Circle 1(3)(1), Mumbai vs Group M Media India Private Limited, MumbaiITA 9197/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ucb India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs Addl/ ACIT/ Jt/ Dy/ NFAC, MumbaiITA 905/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Interactive Television Private Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4862/MUM/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Denso Haryana Private Limited, New Delhi vs JCIT, Special Range 3, New DelhiITA 1250/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026