INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.KENNAMETAL SHARED SERVICES PVT. LTD., BANGALORE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that telecommunication charges incurred in foreign currency, when reduced from export turnover, should also be reduced from total turnover for Section 10A deduction. This decision was based on the binding precedent of the Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against an order concerning the computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The core dispute involved the exclusion of telecommunication and travel expenses from export turnover and total turnover.
What were the issues?
Whether telecommunication and travel expenses should be excluded from export turnover and total turnover when computing deduction under Section 10A. The Tribunal specifically addressed telecommunication charges in foreign currency.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.818 citing349 ITR 98 · 2012 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘ C ’
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI JASON P BOAZ
Per Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J.M. : This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order dt.22.06.2017 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Bangalore for the Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The revenue has raised the following grounds :
The only issue raised by the revenue in this appeal is regarding exclusion of telecommunication and travel expenses from the export turnover as well as total turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
Having considered the rival submissions as well as the material on record, we find that the issue of expenditure incurred towards telecommunication charges in foreign currency is reduced from export turnover an equal amount should also be reduced from total turnover while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Act, is covered
Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 349 ITR 98 (Kar). The decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court is a binding precedent for the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal. Hence, this issue is decided against the revenue and in favour of assessee. 5. In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on the 22nd day of Sept.,2017.
More judgments on Section 10A
- Ahaguru Education Technology Private… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1993/CHNY/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
- M/S. Aradhyaa Infra & Holdings Pvt. Ltd… vs ITO, Corp. Ward-1(1), ChennaiITA 1793/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Tech Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 2(3), MumbaiITA 7487/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed24 Aug 2026AY 2008-09
- D.C.I.T. Circle 3(3), Mumbai vs Rbs Business Services P. Ltd., MumbaiITA 4467/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
- Rbs Business Services P.Ltd, Mumbai vs DCIT Cir 3(3), MumbaiITA 4306/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Imperial Marketing vs. Principal Commissioner Of CGST Delhi NorthDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026