Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17. The Assessing Officer (AO) had issued a notice u/s.148 of the Act, to which the assessee responded, but the AO did not pass a speaking order on the objections raised.
Held
The Tribunal noted that no speaking order was passed by the AO concerning the assessee's objections to the 148 notice. The appeals were restored to the AO for re-adjudication to pass a speaking order on the objections and then proceed with the assessment.
Key Issues
Whether the AO passed a speaking order on the assessee's objections to the notice issued u/s.148 of the Act.
Sections Cited
148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Before: BEFORE S/SHRI GEORGE MATHANSHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
O R D E R Per Bench These are appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of ld re appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of ld re appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of ld CIT(A), NFAC Delhi all dated 9.10.2023 in Appeal No.NFAC CIT(A), NFAC Delhi all dated 9.10.2023 in Appeal No.NFAC CIT(A), NFAC Delhi all dated 9.10.2023 in Appeal No.NFAC/2012-13/10063054, No.NFAC/2014-15/10055755 15/10055755 and and No.NFAC/2015 No.NFAC/2015-15/10055935 15/10055935 for for the the assessment years 2013 assessment years 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17, respectively, 17, respectively,
Shri Vinaya Kumar Jalan, Vinaya Kumar Jalan, ld AR appeared for the assesse ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Khub Chand Pandya, ld Sr DR appeared for the r Chand Pandya, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
P a g e 1 | 3 to 236/RAN/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17
It was submitted by ld AR that the Assessing Officer has issued notice u/s.148 of the Act in the case of the assessee on 20.3.2020. It was the submission that the assessee had filed his response to the notice on 12.5.2020. It was the submission that the AO has not passed a speaking order on the objection of the assessee in respect of 148 notice. At this point, it was informed to ld AR that the issues in regard to 148 orders on the objection would have to be restored to the AO for readjudication and passing of a speaking order, ld AR did not raise any objection.
Ld Sr DR submitted that he has no objection if the issue is restored to the file of the AO fFor passing a speaking order on the objection filed by the assessee to 148 notice.
We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that there is no speaking order but only passing reference has been made by the ld CIT(A), the issues are restored to the file of the AO for re-adjudication. The AO shall pass a speaking order on the objection filed by the assessee to 148 notice. After passing the order on the objection of the assessee, the AO shall proceed with the assessment. As an irregularity has happened on the point where the objections have not been disposed of by the AO in respect of notice 148 issued, the issues in the appeal are restored to the point of irregularity has taken place for non- passing of a speaking order in respect of objection. That irregularity is to be cleared by the AO and then the assessment is to be made
P a g e 2 | 3 to 236/RAN/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17
In the result, appeals of the assesseee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 10/06/2025.