DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE CHINARS, NEAR GOVT. SILK FACTORY, RAJBAGH , SRINAGAR vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SRINAGAR, KASHMIR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer has no power to recompute book profits beyond the adjustments expressly set out in Section 115JB. Book profits must be determined based on accounts prepared in accordance with accounting principles and the Companies Act.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the deletion of additions made to book profits for MAT computation. The assessee had debited a provision for CSR expenditure in its profit and loss account as per the Companies Act, 2013.
What were the issues?
Whether a provision for CSR expenditure, made as per the Companies Act, 2013, is an unascertained liability to be added back for computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. CIT657 citing255 ITR 273 · 2002 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd.118 citing305 ITR 409 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. UDAYAN DASGUPTA & SH. KRINWANT SAHAY
Per Udayan Dasgupta, J.M.:
All the three appeal preferred by the revenue against the order of the Ld. CIT (A) NFAC, passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), dated 17th October, 2023 for the Asstt. Year 2016-17 and dated 30th November, 2023, for both the AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19, has emanated from the order of the DCIT Circle- Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 Srinagar, passed u/s 143(3) dated 28th December, 2018 (for AY 2017-18 ), and orders
of AO - NFAC, both dated 05/08/2021 AY 2017-18 and 2018-19, respectively.
The only issue raise
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026