ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(1), CHENNAI vs. TECH-SHARP ENGINEERS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, appeals with a tax effect less than Rs. 20,00,000 do not lie before the Tribunal. The Departmental Representative conceded this point.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 14,47,931 by the CIT(A). The assessee argued that the tax effect was below the threshold specified by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal when the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P.GEORGE & SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal of the Revenue is directed against an order dated 19.05.2017 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that 2.
Departmental appeal was against deletion of an addition of . :- 2 -: �14,47,931/-, by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). As
per ld. Authorised Representative tax effect being less than twenty lakhs, by virtue of CBDT Circular No.3/2018, dated 11.07.2018, the appeal will not lie.
Per contra, ld. Departmental Representative fairly agreed 3.
that the tax effect thereof was less than the limit mentioned in the CBDT circular.
We have considered the rival contentions and perused the orders of the authorities below. By virtue of Circular No.03/2018, dated 11.07.2018, an appeal of the Revenue will not lie before this Tribunal where the tax effect is less than �20,00,000/-.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed 5.
Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on Thursday, the 12th June, 2018, at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026