DCIT CIR 6(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. K. RIGHT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS P.LTD, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition, finding that the share premium charged was justified by the company's reserves and surplus, and the book value per share. The identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction by the investor company were also accepted.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,12,50,000 made under Section 68 of the IT Act, which represented share premium received by the assessee. The Assessing Officer had reopened the assessment on the grounds that the share premium received by the unlisted company was not substantiated.
What were the issues?
Whether the share premium received by an unlisted company is to be added as income under Section 68 when the investor's identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction are established and the premium is justified by the company's financial position.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ H ”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M):
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of CIT(A)- 12, Mumbai dated 21/09/2016 for A.Y.2009-10 in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the IT Act.
In this appeal, revenue is aggrieved for deleting addition of Rs.1,12,50,000/- u/s.68 of the IT Act being the amount under the head ‘share capital / share premium’.
Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessee company is in services sector, providing advisory services in the field of Finance and Strategy. The assessment M/s. K.Right Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd., In question had been reopened u/s. 147 of the Act on the ground that the assessee company is in receipt of huge share premium amounting to Rs.1,12,50,000/-, and the assessee being an unlisted company, the nature of the share application received is not substantiated. Accordingly AO added this amount u/s.68 of the IT Act.
By the impugned order, CIT(A) deleted the addition after observing as under:- 6.3 I have carefully perused the assessment order and the submission of the appellant. On perusal of the submission filed on records, it is seen that the AO has added the share premium of Rs 1,12,50,0007- and accepted the share capital of Rs 12,50,000/-. The appellant, during assessment proceedings before the AO, has give the reason for charging the share premium which is noted in page 3 of the assessment order. The AO has not given the reason why and as to how the company could not charge the share premium. It is seen from the balance sheet as on 31.03,2009 that the appellant has reserve and surplus earned from profit & loss account of Rs 54,98,434/- as on 31.03.2008 and of Rs 85,20,361/- as on 31.03.2009. If the number of shares are divided to this amount then the amount allotted per share will be Rs 550 as on 31.03.2008 and Rs 852 as on 31.03.2009. The appellant has allotted the share at the end of the year, ie, on 28.02.2009 and therefore charge of premium of Rs 900 is appearing to be a very close figure of Rs 852/-. Hence/ the transaction of charging of premium of Rs 900/- is not an abnormal transaction and can be looked into on the basis of preponderance of human probabilities. Therefore, the decision relied on by the AO with respect to the preponderance of probabilities is not found acceptable here in this case. Further, during assessment proceedings/ the AO has not pin pointed anything on record and brought out on record as to how the value of charging of share premium is not acceptable to him. It is also seen that the AO has accepted the identity and creditworthiness of the investor. The AO has even partly accepted the genuineness of the transaction with respect to the corresponding share capital of Rs 12,50,0007- but has not accepted the share premium which has no logic. The whole addition is made on the basis of assumptions and presumptions. The judicial rulings relied on by the AO are on different aspects and A.O. has also not explained as to how these decisions are applicable in the instant case. Hence, I do not find any merit in the assessment order. Therefore, ground no 1 of the appeal is allowed.
M/s. K.Right Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd.,
Against the above order, Revenue is in further appeal before us.
Learned DR relied on the order of the AO, whereas learned AR relied on the order of CIT(A). He also invited our attention to the audited accounts placed on record which reflected that assessee was having sufficient reserve and surplus so as to suit the premium amount charged on the preference shares so issued to M/s. Business Match Services (I) Pvt. Ltd. Our attention was also invited to the return filed by M/s. Business Match Services (I) Pvt. Ltd. at an income of Rs.4.46 Crores on which tax of Rs.1.43 Crores was paid. 7. We have considered rival contentions and carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below. From the record, we found that during the year assessee company received share application money from Business Match Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. for subscribing 1% Non- Cumulative Non-Convertible Preference Share of Rupees of 100/- each along with Rs. 900/- as Share Premium, The company allotted fully paid up 12,500, 1% Non-Cumulative Non-Convertible Preference Shares of face value of Rs.100/' at a Premium of Rs.900/- on 28/02/2009. The address of Subscriber M/s Business Match Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. is Shop No. 2, Neptune II, Smt Nargis Putt Road, Pali Hill, Bandra (W) Mumbai - 400050, PAN No, AAACB6129N. Details of payments received from the share subscriber vide account payee cheques issued on HDFC Bank. Before allotment of fresh Shares, the company had a M/s. K.Right Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd., paid up capital of Rs. 100,000/- (10,000 Equity Shares of Rs. 10 each fully paid up) with Revenue Reserve & Surplus of Rs. 55 Lacs on 31.03.2008, which means book value per share of the company was Rs. 560 per share. At the end of the year ie. as on 31.03.2009 the Revenue Reserve & Surplus excluding share premium was Rs, 85 Lacs by this, the value per Share of the company was Rs. 860 per share, ie; shares were valued 86 times its face value. It is pertinent to note that the new shares were issued at nine times its face value. The book value per share of the company itself justifies the charging of premium on share and also on the basis of future Prospect of the business / investment. The Business Match Services (India) Pvt Ltd, who subscribed/invested in Preference Capital of the company is a Investment company and its net worth is more than Rs 2,500 Lacs and the size of the Audited Balance Sheet is in excess of Rs 10,000 lacs, as can be seen from its Balance Sheet as on 31.3.2009 which is placed on record.
After analyzing the balance sheet of the assessee company, the CIT(A) has recorded a finding to the effect that assessee has reserve and surplus as on 31/03/2009, according to which volume per share works out to Rs.852/- and assessee has issued a share at a premium of Rs.900/- which is very near to the figure of Rs.852/-. A categorical finding has also been recorded by CIT(A) with regard to identity and creditworthiness of the investor company M/s. Business Match Services (I) Pvt. Ltd. as well as the genuineness of the transaction. Finding recorded by CIT(A) are as per material on record which has not been controverted by learned DR by M/s. K.Right Management Solutions Pvt. Ltd., bringing any positive material on record. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the finding so recorded by CIT(A) resulting into deletion of addition made u/s.68 of the IT Act.
In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026