ITO 14(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. ABHAY KUMAR MASKARA, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3430/MUM/2012Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 April 2018AY 2007-0814 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the sale of paintings by the assessee did not constitute business activity or an adventure in the nature of trade. Since paintings were considered personal effects during the relevant period, the income earned from their sale was not taxable.

What were the facts?

The assessee declared income from bank interest, article writing, and dividend, but also reported long-term and short-term capital gains from the sale of paintings. The Assessing Officer treated the gains from paintings as business income, while the CIT(A) held them as capital gains but not exempt as personal effects.

What were the issues?

Whether the sale of paintings constituted business income or capital gains, and whether paintings were considered personal effects during the relevant assessment year.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(14),Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES “A”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU (AM) & SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM)

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Aggarwal (AR)
For Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav (DR), Shri Madhur Aggarwal (AR)
Hearing: 16/03/2018Pronounced: 27/04/2018

आदेश प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. आयकर आय क्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)- 4. आयकर आय क्त / CIT 5. दिभ गीय प्रदिदनदि, आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण, म ुंबई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 2(14)

All 1,130 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(14) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →