SHAMSHER SINGH,ROHTAK vs. ITO WARD-1, JIND

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1116/DEL/2023Status: HeardITAT Delhi08 February 2024AY 2010-11Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Sh. Anubhav Sharma (Judicial Member)2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the quantum orders had already been remanded to the CIT(A). Consequently, in the interest of justice, the penalty appeals were also remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, contingent upon the outcome of the quantum appeals.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed multiple appeals against orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 01.03.2023, confirming penalties under section 271(1)(c) and 271A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) erred by not allowing time for disposal of quantum additions, especially after the ITAT had directed the CIT(A) to re-fix the quantum addition appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming penalties under sections 271(1)(c) and 271A without awaiting the finalization of the quantum appeals, especially when quantum orders had already been remanded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c),Section 271A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’, NEW DELHI

Before: Dr. B. R. R. KumarSh. Anubhav Sharma

Hearing: 07.02.2024Pronounced: 08.02.2024

Heard together (4 matters)

ITA No. 1115/Del/2023
ITA No. 1116/Del/2023
ITA No. 1162/Del/2023
ITA No. 1163/Del/2023

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

ORDER Per Bench: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 01.03.2023. Since, the issue involved in all these appeals are similar, they were heard together and being adjudicated by a common order. 2. Common ground raised by the assessee in & 1163/Del/2023. In ITA No. 1115/Del/2023, following grounds have been raised by the assessee:

1.

“1. That the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre erred in law and infact (in confirming the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) amounting to Rs.1,13,850/- by the ld. AO, ITO, Ward-1, Jind on wrong and untenable grounds.

ITA Nos. 1115, 1116 & 1163/Del/2023 2 Shamsher Singh 2. That the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre erred in law and infact (by not giving time to the appellant for disposal of quantum addition in the case of the assessee) (As Hon’ble ITAT, New Delhi have given directions to Hon’ble CIT(A) to again re-fix the appeal of quantum addition of the appellant) on wrong and untenable grounds.”

3.

Common ground have been raised in & 1162/Del/2023. In , following grounds have been raised by the assessee:

“1. That the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre erred in law and infact (in confirming the penalty imposed u/s 271A amounting to Rs.25,000/- by the ld. AO, ITO, Ward-1, Jind on wrong and untenable grounds.

2.

That the order of the ld. CIT(A) National Faceless Appeal Centre erred in law and infact (by not giving time to the appellant for disposal of quantum addition in the case of the assessee) (As Hon’ble ITAT, New Delhi have given directions to Hon’ble CIT(A) to again re-fix the appeal of quantum addition of the appellant) on wrong and untenable grounds.”

4.

It was brought to our notice that the quantum orders stands remanded to the file of the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 23.02.2022 and hence, in the interest of justice, the penalty appeals are also being remanded to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to adjudicate these appeals keeping in view the outcome in the quantum appeals.

5.

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 08/02/2024. Sd/- Sd/- (Anubhav Sharma) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 08/02/2024 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →