ACIT, CIRCLE CC 15, NEW DELHI vs. ALKA MENDIRATTA , DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the addition was not sustainable as the assessee was not a party to the agreement to sell, which was cancelled and not executed. No evidence of payment by the assessee beyond the registered sale deed value was found.
What were the facts?
During a search, an agreement to sell a property for Rs. 40.06 crores was found. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 12.03 crores to the assessee's income as undisclosed investment, considering the higher value in the agreement to sell compared to the registered sale deed.
What were the issues?
Whether an addition can be made under Section 69 based on an unexecuted agreement to sell between third parties, without proof of payment by the assessee? Whether the assessment under Section 153A is valid without incriminating material belonging to the assessee?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(19)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT1,061 citing26 ITR 775 · 1954 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing7 Taxmann 13 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. R. Nalini Devi ITTA 232 of 2013 (A. P)299 citing294 ITR 49 · 2007 · SC
- 109 TTJ 700 (Del) SMC Share Brokers Ltd. v. DCIT264 citing293 ITR 43 · 2007 · HC
- Distributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India229 citing155 ITR 120 · 1985 · SC
- CIT v. Kulwant Rai142 citing291 ITR 36 · 2007 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. P.V. Kalyanasundaram108 citing282 ITR 259 · 2006 · HC
- CIT v. Ved Prakash Choudhary95 citing305 ITR 245 · 2008 · HC · Read judgment
- Bengal Immunity Company Limited v. State of Bihar75 citing2 SCR 603 · 1955
- CIT v. Naresh Khattar (HUF)75 citing261 ITR 664 · 2003 · HC
- Paramjit Singh v. ITO59 citing323 ITR 588 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Mother India Refrigeration Industries (P.) Ltd.47 citing155 ITR 711 · 1985 · SC
- CIT v. Lubtec India Ltd.34 citing311 ITR 175 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Smt. K.C. Agnes27 citing262 ITR 354 · 2003 · HC
- 257 (Bom) CIT v. Devesh Agarwal (extracted13 citing64 Taxmann.com 332 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Moon Mills Ltd.11 citing59 ITR 574 · 1966 · SC · Read judgment
- K.P. Vargheser v. ITO5 citing131 ITR 587 · 1981 · SC
- Vikrant Dutt Chaudhary v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Panchkula (Haryana)5 citing88 Taxmann.com 727 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Provestment Securities (P.) Ltd.3 citing65 Taxmann.com 69 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘H’, NEW DELHI Before Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member Ms. Astha Chandra, Judicial Member ITA No. 1863/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Central Circle-15, House No. 10, Road No. 41, Punjabi New Delhi-110055 Bagh, New Delhi-110026 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAIPM3927A CO No. 28/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Central Circle-15, Bagh, New Delhi-110026 New Delhi-110055 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAIPM3927A ITA No. 1864/Del/2021 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Central Circle-15, House No. 10, Road No. 41, Punjabi New Delhi-110055 Bagh, New Delhi-110026 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AALMP5560E CO No. 25/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Central Circle-15, Bagh, New Delhi-110026 New Delhi-110055 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AALMP5560E Assessee by : Sh. Amit Goel, CA & Sh. Pranav Yadav, Advv. Revenue by : Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 14.02.2024 Date of Pronouncement: 08.03.2024
ITA Nos. 1863 & 1864/Del/2021 2 CO Nos. 25 & 28/Del/2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026