MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-16(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the composite rental income should be treated as 'Income from Other Sources', following its own consistent decisions in the assessee's own cases for earlier assessment years. Other grounds related to adjustments from intimation u/s 143(1) were dismissed, and penalty proceedings were deemed premature.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd., appealed against assessment orders for AY 2017-18 and 2018-19. A key issue was whether composite rental income should be taxed as 'Income from House Property' or 'Income from Other Sources'. The assessee argued for the latter, citing previous ITAT decisions in its own case.
What were the issues?
Whether composite rental income is taxable under 'Income from House Property' or 'Income from Other Sources', and the validity of adjustments made during assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 56,Section 57,Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 40(a)(iib),Section 36(1)(va),Section 43B,Section 270A,Section 274
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘I’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM
ITA Nos.-1483/Del/2022 and 1640/Del/2022 are two separate
appeals by the Assessee preferred against two separate orders dated
2022 and 27.05.2022 framed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13)
of the Act. Since common issues are involved, both these appeals were ITA nos.- 1483 & 1640/Del/2022 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. heard together and are disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity.
ITA No.- 1483/Del/2022 for A.Y. 2017-18
The grievances of the assessee read as under:
“1. Draft assessment order passed by t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 56
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Lokmanya Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha… vs ITO Ward 1(1), KolhapurITA 3409/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- The Vijapur Taluka Co-Operative Purchase… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PatanITA 925/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Vakil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Limited… vs ITO, Ward - 1, LaturITA 2711/PUN/2026[2022 - 2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Ramashish Rajbali Yadav, Thane vs Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) Mumbai…ITA 4377/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026