M/S. OVERGROW CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 13(3), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal set aside the appeal to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(A) on a specific date.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from an ex parte order passed by the CIT(A). The tribunal noted that the CIT(A) provided no findings to support the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex parte without proper findings is sustainable. The need for de novo adjudication on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH : KOLKATA
Before: Hon’ble Shri S.S.Godara, JM & Hon’ble Shri M.Balaganesh, AM]
ORDER Per M.Balaganesh, AM
This appeal by the Assessee arises out of the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-15, Kolkata [in short the ld CIT(A)] in Appeal No.N174/CIT(A)- 5/Wd-13(3)/16-17/Kol dated 03.01.2018 against the order passed by ITO, Ward-1(3), Kolkata [ in short the ld AO] under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 23.11.2016 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee.
We have heard the ld. DR. We find that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) had been passed ex parte. There is absolutely no finding given by the Ld. CIT(A) to support the order of M/s Overgrow Construction Pvt. Ltd. A.Yr. 2014-15 the ld. AO. Hence in the interest of justice and fair play, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we deem it fit and appropriate to set aside this appeal to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for de novo adjudication of the issue on merits uninfluenced by earlier decision taken by him in this regard. We direct the assessee to appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on 18.04.2019 and not to take any adjournment except due to exceptional or unavoidable circumstances. Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the Court on 28.12.2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sri Hardik Gowda vs. Sri Jayaram PKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- Shiv Ram vs. State Of Hp And OrsHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Ampl Resources PVT. LTD., Through Sri Om Prakash Pareek, Authorised Signatory vs. The State Of JharkhandJharkhand · 3 Nov 2026
- Saleem vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026
- Ms R Ess Iron And Steel PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsGauhati · 3 Nov 2026