ACIT, NON CORPORATE CIRCLE-1, COIMBATORE vs. V R FOUNDARIES, COIMBATORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 355/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 August 2018AY 2013-143 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submission and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. The appeal was deemed not maintainable as the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary limit.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT with a delay of 24 days, which was condoned. The assessee argued that the appeal was not maintainable due to a CBDT circular regarding monetary limits for appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable considering the CBDT's circular on monetary limits for appeals.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY

Hearing: 16.08.2018

आदेश / O R D E R Per A. Mohan Alankamony, AM:-

1.

The appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Chennai, dated 28.09.2017 in for the assessment year 2013- 14 passed U/s.250(6) r.w.s. 143 of the Act.

2.

There is a delay of 24 days in filing the appeal by the Revenue. The Ld.DCIT has furnished an affidavit before us stating that the delay had occurred due to displacement of assessment records. It was therefore pleaded that the short delay in filing the appeal may be condoned. The Ld.AR objected to the submission of the Ld.DR. However, after hearing both sides, though we do not appreciate the lethargic attitude of the Revenue, in the interest of justice we are of the considered view that the short delay in filing the appeal requires to be condoned. Accordingly we hereby condone the delay of 24 days in filing the appeal by the Revenue and proceed to hear the case on merits.

3.

At the outset, the Ld.AR submitted before us that the above mentioned appeal is not maintainable due to the latest Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the CBDT with respect to monetary limit. Hence, it was pleaded that the appeal of the Revenue may be dismissed. The Ld. DR could not controvert to the submission of the Ld.AR.

4.

After hearing both sides we find merit in the submission of the Ld.AR. The CBDT has directed the Revenue not to file appeal before the Tribunal where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.20 lakhs. In the above mentioned appeal of the assessee the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, we hereby dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue as not maintainable.

5.

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on the 16th August, 2018 at Chennai.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →