Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10.12.2015 passed by learned CIT(A)-2, Gurgaon for the assessment year 2012-13.
None was present on behalf of the appellant despite the notice was sent through registered post at the address given in column No. 10 of the appeal memo, fixing the date of hearing on 27.09.2017. The notice so issued, having been not received back, is, therefore, deemed to be served upon the assessee.
ITA No. 123/Del./2016 2 However, there is no representation or application for adjournment on behalf of the assessee received on record. Therefore, it can be safely inferred that the assessee is not serious in pursuing its appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left with us is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).