SMT ARTI KHANNA(THROUGH L/H SANJAY KHANNA),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matters back to the file of the CIT(A) to decide the issues on merits after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee was also directed to ensure proper compliance.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were filed against ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A) for multiple assessment years. The assessee could not represent its case before the CIT(A) due to unavoidable circumstances.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing ex-parte orders without deciding the appeals on merits. The primary issue was the restoration of appeals for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
PER BENCH:
The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate orders dated 19/1/2015, passed by the ld. CIT(A)-41, New Delhi for the quantum of assessments passed under section 153A/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2011-12.
In all the appeals, besides taking various grounds on legal issues as well as on merits, the assessee is aggrieved by passing of ex-parte orders by the ld. CIT (A) and without deciding the appeals on merits.
Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee, Shri Sanat Kapoor, submitted that assessments have been made in the case of the assessee in the wake of search and seizure operation under section 132(1) and all the assessments have been completed under section 153A wherein all the additions made are beyond the scope of section 153A, as nothing has been found during the course of search. However, assessee could not represent its case before the ld. CIT (A) due to unavoidable circumstances, therefore, in the interest of justice the matter should be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT (A) for fresh adjudication on merits and in accordance to law.
The ld. D.R. also agreed that the matter can be restored back to the file of the ld. CIT (A).
After considering the aforesaid submissions and on a perusal of the relevant orders, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed ex-parte orders, without deciding the issues on merits though various opportunities appears to have been given by the ld. CIT(A). However, in the interest of justice, we are restoring the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to decide the issues on merits as well as in accordance to law after giving due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee shall also ensure that proper compliance is made before the Ld. CIT (A) on the dates of hearing. With this direction, all the appeals filed by the assessee are remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT (A) and are treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026