ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 14(5), CHENNAI vs. E.D RAJAN, CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, which instructs officers to withdraw appeals with a tax effect below ₹20 lakhs, is binding on the Revenue officers. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed with the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2011-12. Both the Revenue and the Assessee submitted that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than ₹20 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue can proceed with an appeal before the ITAT when the tax effect is below the threshold specified in the CBDT circular for withdrawal of appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘ B’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY
आदेश / O R D E R PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-14), Chennai in dated 29.06.2017 for the assessment year 2011-12.
Mr.Awijit Rakshit represented on behalf of the Revenue and Mr.P.Ranga Ramanujam represented on behalf the of the Assessee.
3. When the appeal is taken up for hearing, the representative of the Revenue and the representative for the Assessee fairly submitted that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than `20 lakhs. It was a submission that the CBDT in its latest Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 instructed its officers to withdraw all the appeals pending before the ITAT where the tax effect is less than`20 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that this Circular of CBDT is binding on the officers of the Department. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed further in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court after conclusion of hearing on 24th September, 2018, at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026