KRISHNA BHAGWAN KOTAK,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CEN CIR 6(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4640/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 June 2018AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not wish to prosecute the appeal. The respondent had no objection to the withdrawal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. During the proceedings, the assessee submitted a communication seeking to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed before the tribunal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI RAVISH SOOD

For Appellant: Shri Harsh Shah
For Respondent: Ms. Arju Garodia
Hearing: 12/06/2018Pronounced: 12/06/2018

PER G.S. PANNU, AM :

When the proceedings were called out to consider grant of out-of- turn hearing, the learned representative for the assessee furnished a communication of the appellant dated 04.06.2018 seeking to withdraw the appeal filed before the Tribunal. As the assessee does not wish to prosecute the appeal, the ld. DR has no objection if the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn as per the prayer of the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

2 Krishna Bhagwan Kotak

The above was announced in the presence of both the parties on 12th June, 2018. (RAVISH SOOD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Date : 12th June, 2018 *SSL*

Copy to : 1) The Appellant 2) The Respondent 3) The CIT(A) concerned 4) The CIT concerned 5) The D.R, “H” Bench, Mumbai 6) Guard file By Order

Dy./Asstt.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →