Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M. : The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned CIT, Rohatak, dated 27.06.2014, refusing registration to the assessee society u/s. 12AA of the IT Act.
None is present on behalf of the assessee despite the notice sent to the assessee at the given address. The notice so issued is deemed to be served upon the assessee. However, there is no representation on behalf of the assessee nor is there any written request for adjournment on record. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
ITA No. 4850/Del./2014 2 Therefore, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).