GANESH PRASAD KHETAN,RAIPUR (CG) vs. ADDL.CIT, RANGE-II, RAIPUR(CG)
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of long-term capital gains being treated as income from undisclosed sources was squarely covered in favor of the assessee by its previous decision in the 'Saraogi Group' cases. The Tribunal found no distinguishing facts presented by the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee disclosed long-term capital gains, which the Assessing Officer treated as income from undisclosed sources under Section 68. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition. The assessee appealed this decision, arguing that the issue was already decided in his favor by the Tribunal in similar cases.
What were the issues?
Whether long-term capital gains disclosed by the assessee can be treated as income from undisclosed sources under Section 68, especially when similar issues have been decided in favor of the assessee by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM
These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the order dated 27/11/2013 passed by CIT(A), Raipur (CG) for the A.Ys 2005-06 & 2006-07. 2. The grounds of appeal are as under:
I.T.A .No. 37/RPR/2014 (A.Y 2005-06) :
“1In the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 25,87,213 made by the A.O treating the long term capital gain disclosed by the assessee as income from undisclosed sources. The order of the Ld. CIT(A) confirming the addition is contrary to the evidences filed and is not justifies.”.
I.T.A. No. 153/RPR/2014 (A.Y. 2006-07)
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026