RAGHURAJ SINGH,GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR vs. JCIT, NOIDA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal in limine due to the assessee's non-appearance and lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. The order can be recalled if the assessee shows sufficient cause for non-appearance.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was listed for hearing, but the notice sent by RPAD was returned undelivered. The assessee did not provide any updated address or appear for the hearing.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed in limine due to the assessee's non-appearance and failure to prosecute the appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- CIT v. B.N. Bhattacharya & Another1,656 citing118 ITR 461 · 1997 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K.PANDA
ORDER Per R.K.Panda, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31st March, 2017 of the CIT(A)- 1, Noida relating to assessment year 2014-15. This appeal was fixed for hearing on 24th September, 2017 by 2. issuing of notice through RPAD. However, the said notice was returned by the postal authorities with the remark “not available”. The assessee has not taken any steps to intimate the changed address if any. This type of attitude on the part of the assessee shows that he is not interested in prosecuting the appeal filed by it. Therefore, following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. reported in 38 ITD 320 and the decision 2 (Raghuraj Singh) of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another reported in 118 ITR 461, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in limine. However, if the assessee, through proper application can satisfy the bench for such non-appearance, the Tribunal may at its discretion recall the order. The appeal filed by the assessee is accordingly dismissed.
In the result appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court at the time of hearing itself i.e. on 27.09.2017)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S New Sana Brick Field vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026