M/S.NOORANAD NORTH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED vs. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I AND CI)
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court, respectfully following a Supreme Court decision, held that the Income Tax Officer has the jurisdiction to proceed under the second proviso of Section 133(6) without prior authorization from the Director or Commissioner.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by two co-operative banks challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The core issue revolved around the Income Tax Officer's jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Income Tax Officer requires authorization from higher authorities to issue notices under the second proviso of Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1942 ITA.No.38 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 317/COCH/2019 DATED 18-06-2019 OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: MAVELIKKARA GOVERNMENT SERVANTS CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.A.792, MAVELIKKARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AYAVANA P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-690 101 BY ADVS. DR.V.N.SANKARJEE SRI.VINCENT JOSEPH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I AND CI) KOCHI KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-682 011, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC IT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.08.2020, ALONG WITH ITA.35/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T. Appeal Nos. 38 & 35 of 2020 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1942 ITA.No.35 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ITA 462/COCH/2019 DATED 24-10-2019 OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: M/S.NOORANAD NORTH SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO.1781, IRANIKUZHY P.O. (PAN AABAN3615N), MAVELIKKARA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690 558 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS. DR.V.N.SANKARJEE SRI.VINCENT JOSEPH RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I AND CI) KOCHI, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI - 682 011, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.08.2020, ALONG WITH ITA.38/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T. Appeal Nos. 38 & 35 of 2020 3 JUDGMENT Vinod Chandran, J. The question as to whether the Income Tax Officer has jurisdiction to proceed under second proviso of Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act without authorisation of the Director or the Commissioner as the case may be, was answered against the assessees and in favour of the Department by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kathiroor Service Cooperative Bank Limited V. Commissioner of Income Tax (Cib) and Others 2014 (14) SCC 352. Respectfully following the aforesaid decision, we dismiss the appeals. Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE Pn 05/08
I.T. Appeal Nos. 38 & 35 of 2020 4 APPENDIX OF ITA 38/2020 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-I TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT'S ORDER F.NO.DIT(INTEL)/272A(2)(C)/2014-15 DATED 27.10.2014 OF THE ADDL. DIRECTOR OR INCOME TAX (INTELLIGENCE), KOCHI ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.2.2019 IN ITA NO.723/ITG/EKM/CIT(A)-1/2014-15 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, KOCHI
I.T. Appeal Nos. 38 & 35 of 2020 5 APPENDIX OF ITA 35/2020 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE-I TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 2.9.2013 ISSUED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE), ALAPPUZHA ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLANT'S REPLY DATED 12.10.2013 SUBMITTED TO THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE), ALAPPUZHA AGAINST ANNEXURE 1 NOTICE ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT'S NOTICE DATED 1.6.2015 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT. ANNEXURE IV TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLANT'S REPLY DATED 12.6.2015 SUBMITTED TO THE RESPONDENT AGAINST ANNEXURE III NOTICE ANNEXURE V TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDENT'S ORDER DATED 22.12.2015 ISSUED TO THE APPELLANT ANNEXURE VI TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.5.2019 ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, KOCHI IN ITA NO.99/ITG/EKM/CIT(A)-1/2015-16.
More judgments on Section 133(6)
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Rangoli Hotel, Mehsana vs DCIT, Circle, Gandhinagar, GandhiangarITA 2286/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Ritu Rajesh Gohil, Jamnagar, Gujarat vs ITO Ward 2(1), Jamnagar, GujaratITA 109/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026