THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NADUVIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the memo to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court. The Revenue subsequently filed a memo to withdraw the appeal. The High Court noted that proportionate court fee had already been granted.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the Revenue.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 9TH MAGHA, 1942 ITA.No.185 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 621/Coch/2017 DATED 3-09-2018 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KOZHIKODE BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SR.STANDING COUNSEL,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: M/S NADUVIL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NADUVIL, KANNUR THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.Appeal No.185/19 -:2:- JUDGMENT Dated this the 29th day of January, 2021 S.V.Bhatti
, J. Memo dated 14.01.2021 filed by Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department to withdraw the appeal is ordered. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sri.Christopher Abraham draws our attention to the judgment of this Court in I.T.A. No.74 of 2016 dated 11.11.2019 and states that refund of proportionate court fee, taking into consideration the memo filed to withdraw the appeal etc., has been granted. Refund of proportionate court fee is ordered. Hence the Registry makes refund of court fee to the extent admissible in law. Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps
I.T.Appeal No.185/19 -:3:- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 4.3.2015 ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 22.8.2017 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 3.9.2018 PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026