THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. RAMANATTUKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court considered the memo filed by the Revenue to withdraw the appeal. The Court ordered the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court. The Revenue later filed a memo to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue should be withdrawn.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 9TH MAGHA, 1942 ITA.No.192 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER IN ITA 535/Coch/2017 DATED 20-06-2018 OF I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SR.STANDING COUNSEL,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE: M/S RAMANATTUKARA SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., FAROOK COLLEGE PO, KOZHIKODE. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
I.T.Appeal No.192/19 -:2:- JUDGMENT Dated this the 29th day of January, 2021 S.V.Bhatti
, J. Memo dated 14.01.2021 filed by Sri.Christopher Abraham, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department to withdraw the appeal is ordered. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sri.Christopher Abraham draws our attention to the judgment of this Court in I.T.A. No.74 of 2016 dated 11.11.2019 and states that refund of proportionate court fee, taking into consideration the memo filed to withdraw the appeal etc., has been granted. Refund of proportionate court fee is ordered. Hence the Registry makes refund of court fee to the extent admissible in law. Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI JUDGE Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE vps
I.T.Appeal No.192/19 -:3:- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 05.02.2015. ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 14.06.2017 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(APPEALS). ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.06.2018 PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026